Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
The land is mainly grade 2 and 3a. Government policy is not to use grade 1 to 3b farmland for solar development. So why are RES proposing this plan and on what grounds would East Suffolk Council approve it? We have a section on the relevant East Suffolk policies here
We already import large quantities of food from abroad and the Ukraine war has led to less supply and higher prices. It makes no sense to take our fertile farmland out of production.
The RES proposal removes farmland from production for at least 40 years! We cannot replace this farmland but we can place solar panels on residential and commercial roof spaces as well as brownfield sites. Lobby East Suffolk Council to follow a policy of utilising brownfield sites and rooftops for solar panels so we can have both solar power and productive farmland.
In January 2023 economists reported that sharp increases in fertiliser costs caused by the war in Ukraine could lower food production yield, They said that by the end of the 2020's agricultural land equivalent to "the size of much of Western Europe" would be required to meet global demand for food. The consequence is "severe impacts" for deforestation, biodiversity and carbon emissions. .Please contact East Suffolk Council to ensure they are not responsible for making this situation worse.
Of course crops need to rotated so those 300 acres will be sufficient to produce: